Response to No gene-specific optimization of mutation rate in Escherichia coli

Response to No gene-specific optimization of mutation rate in Escherichia coli
Inigo Martincorena, Nicholas M. Luscombe
(Submitted on 7 May 2013)

In a letter published in Molecular Biology Evolution [10], Chen and Zhang argue that the variation of the mutation rate along the Escherichia coli genome that we recently reported [3] cannot be evolutionarily optimised. To support this claim they first attempt to calculate the selective advantage of a local reduction in the mutation rate and conclude that it is not strong enough to be favoured by selection. Second, they analyse the distribution of 166 mutations from a wild-type E. coli K12 MG1655 strain and 1,346 mutations from a repair-deficient strain, and claim to find a positive association between transcription and mutation rate rather than the negative association that we reported. Here we respond to this communication. Briefly, we explain how the long-standing theory of mutation-modifier alleles supports the evolution of local mutation rates within a genome by mechanisms acting on sufficiently large regions of a genome, which is consistent with our original observations [3,4]. We then explain why caution must be exercised when comparing mutations from repair deficient strains to data from wild-type strains, as different mutational processes dominate these conditions. Finally, a reanalysis of the data used by Zhang and Chen with an alternative expression dataset reveals that their conclussions are unreliable.

1 thought on “Response to No gene-specific optimization of mutation rate in Escherichia coli

  1. Hi there!
    Just to give some context to this post, this is essentially the response we sent to Nature when Chen and Zhang submitted their letter there as a technical comment. Upon consideration of our response, Nature decided not to publish Chen and Zhang’s critique. Following the publication of their letter in MBE, to which we were unable to response, we have now decided to make our response public in ArXiv.
    We have also recently published a review on the evolution of local mutation rates, which we hope better clarifies our view on this topic.
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bies.201200150/abstract
    Many thanks for posting in Haldane’s sieve! 🙂
    Iñigo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s