There is growing use of ontologies for the measurement of cross-species phenotype similarity. Such similarity measurements contribute to diverse applications, such as identifying genetic models for human diseases, transferring knowledge among model organisms, and studying the genetic basis of evolutionary innovations. Two organismal features, whether genes, anatomical parts, or any other inherited feature, are considered to be homologous when they are evolutionarily derived from a single feature in a common ancestor. A classic example is the homology between the paired fins of fishes and vertebrate limbs. Anatomical ontologies that model the structural relations among parts may fail to include some known anatomical homologies unless they are deliberately added as separate axioms. The consequences of neglecting known homologies for applications that rely on such ontologies has not been well studied. Here, we examine how semantic similarity is affected when external homology knowledge is included. We measure phenotypic similarity between orthologous and non-orthologous gene pairs between humans and either mouse or zebrafish, and compare the inclusion of real with faux homology axioms. Semantic similarity was preferentially increased for orthologs when using real homology axioms, but only in the more divergent of the two species comparisons (human to zebrafish, not human to mouse), and the relative increase was less than 1% to non-orthologs. By contrast, inclusion of both real and faux random homology axioms preferentially increased similarities between genes that were initially more dissimilar in the other comparisons. Biologically meaningful increases in semantic similarity were seen for a select subset of gene pairs. Overall, the effect of including homology axioms on cross-species semantic similarity was modest at the levels of divergence examined here, but our results hint that it may be greater for more distant species comparisons.
Yearly Archives: 2015
Gene discovery for Mendelian conditions via social networking: de novo variants in KDM1A cause developmental delay and distinctive facial features
QuicK-mer: A rapid paralog sensitive CNV detection pipeline
Resolving Complex Structural Genomic Rearrangements using a Randomized Approach
Mitochondrial introgression suggests extensive ancestral hybridization events among Saccharomyces species
Fast and accurate long-range phasing and imputation in a UK Biobank cohort
Influenza Evolution and H3N2 Vaccine Effectiveness, with Application to the 2014/2015 Season
Influenza Evolution and H3N2 Vaccine Effectiveness, with Application to the 2014/2015 Season
Xi Li, Michael W. Deem
H3N2 Influenza A is a serious disease which can lead to hospitalization and which causes significant morbidity and mortality. Vaccines against the seasonal influenza disease are of variable effectiveness, for example being fairly low in the 2014/2015 Northern hemisphere season. In this paper, we discuss use of the pepitope method to predict the dominant influenza strain and the expected vaccine effectiveness in the coming flu season. We illustrate how the current A/Texas/50/2012 vaccine is not expected to be protective against the A/California/02/2014 strain that has emerged in the population, consistent with recent observations. In addition, we used multidimensional scaling to cluster the A/H3N2 hemagglutinin from GenBank to find that there is a transition underway from the A/California/02/2014 to the A/New Mexico/11/2014 strain, suggesting the latter may be an appropriate vaccine component for next season.