Bayesian phylogenetic estimation of fossil ages

Bayesian phylogenetic estimation of fossil ages
Alexei J. Drummond, Tanja Stadler

Recent advances have allowed for both morphological fossil evidence and molecular sequences to be integrated into a single combined inference of divergence dates under the rule of Bayesian probability. In particular the fossilized birth-death tree prior and the Lewis-MK model of evolution of discrete morphological change allow for the estimation of both divergence times and phylogenetic relationships between fossil and extant taxa. We exploit this statistical framework to investigate the internal consistency of these models by estimating the phylogenetic age of each fossil in turn, within two rich and well-characterized data sets of fossil and extant species. We find that we can accurately estimate the age of individual fossils based only on phylogenetic evidence. In fact in the two data sets we analyze the phylogenetic age of a fossil species is on average <2My from the midpoint age of the geological strata from which it was excavated. The high level of internal consistency found in our analyses provides strong evidence that the Bayesian statistical model employed is a good fit for both the geological and morphological data, and provides striking evidence from real data that the framework used can accurately model the evolution of discrete morphological traits coded from fossil and extant taxa. We anticipate that this approach will have diverse applications beyond divergence time dating, including dating fossils that are temporally unconstrained, testing the “morphological clock”, and for uncovering potential model misspecification and/or data errors when controversial phylogenetic hypotheses are obtained based on combined divergence dating analyses.

Evolution of dispersal kernel in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster

Sudipta Tung, Abhishek Mishra, P.M. Shreenidhi, Mohammed Aamir Sadiq, Sripad Joshi, V.R. Shree Sruti, Sutirth Dey

Stress affects the epigenetic marks added by Bari-Jheh: a natural insertion associated with two adaptive phenotypes in Drosophila

Stress affects the epigenetic marks added by Bari-Jheh: a natural insertion associated with two adaptive phenotypes in Drosophila

Lain Guio, Cristina Vieira, Josefa González

Identification of positive selection in genes is greatly improved by using experimentally informed site-specific models

Identification of positive selection in genes is greatly improved by using experimentally informed site-specific models

Jesse Bloom

TreeToReads – a pipeline for simulating raw reads from phylogenies

TreeToReads – a pipeline for simulating raw reads from phylogenies

Emily Jane McTavish, James Pettengill, Steven Davis, Hugh Rand, Errol Strain, Marc Allard, Ruth E Timme

The Northern Arizona SNP Pipeline (NASP): accurate, flexible, and rapid identification of SNPs in WGS datasets

The Northern Arizona SNP Pipeline (NASP): accurate, flexible, and rapid identification of SNPs in WGS datasets

Jason W Sahl, Darrin Lemmer, Jason Travis, James Schupp, John Gillece, Maliha Aziz, Elizabeth Driebe, Kevin Drees, Nathan Hicks, Charles Williamson, Crystal Hepp, David Smith, Chandler Roe, David Engelthaler, David Wagner, Paul Keim

Statistics of Cellular Evolution in Leukemia: Allelic Variations in Patient Trajectories Based on Immune Repertoire Sequencing

Statistics of Cellular Evolution in Leukemia: Allelic Variations in Patient Trajectories Based on Immune Repertoire Sequencing

Hong Gao, Chunlin Wang, Junhee Seok, Marcus W Feldman, Wenzhong Xiao

A comparison of ancestral state reconstruction methods for quantitative characters

A comparison of ancestral state reconstruction methods for quantitative characters

Manuela Royer-Carenzi, Gilles Didier

Wright-Fisher construction of the two-parameter Poisson-Dirichlet diffusion

Wright-Fisher construction of the two-parameter Poisson-Dirichlet diffusion
Cristina Costantini, Pierpaolo De Blasi, Stewart N. Ethier, Matteo Ruggiero, Dario Spano

The two-parameter Poisson-Dirichlet diffusion, recently introduced by Petrov, extends the infinitely-many-neutral-alleles diffusion model, related to Kingman’s one-parameter Poisson-Dirichlet distribution and to certain Fleming-Viot processes. The additional parameter has been shown to regulate the clustering structure of the population, but is yet to be fully understood in the way it governs the reproductive process. Here we shed some light on these dynamics by formulating a K-allele Wright-Fisher model for a population of size N, involving a uniform parent-independent mutation pattern and a specific state-dependent immigration kernel. Suitably scaled, this process converges in distribution to a K-dimensional diffusion process as N→∞. Moreover, the descending order statistics of the K-dimensional diffusion converge in distribution to the two-parameter Poisson-Dirichlet diffusion as K→∞. The choice of the immigration kernel depends on a delicate balance between reinforcement and redistributive effects. The proof of convergence to the infinite-dimensional diffusion is nontrivial because the generators do not converge on a core. Our strategy for overcoming this complication is to prove \textit{a priori} that in the limit there is no “loss of mass”, i.e., that, for each limit point of the finite-dimensional diffusions (after a reordering of components by size), allele frequencies sum to one.

Rubbish DNA: The functionless fraction of the human genome
Dan Graur

Because genomes are products of natural processes rather than intelligent design, all genomes contain functional and nonfunctional parts. The fraction of the genome that has no biological function is called rubbish DNA. Rubbish DNA consists of junk DNA, i.e., the fraction of the genome on which selection does not operate, and garbage DNA, i.e., sequences that lower the fitness of the organism, but exist in the genome because purifying selection is neither omnipotent nor instantaneous. In this chapter, I (1) review the concepts of genomic function and functionlessness from an evolutionary perspective, (2) present a precise nomenclature of genomic function, (3) discuss the evidence for the existence of vast quantities of junk DNA within the human genome, (4) discuss the mutational mechanisms responsible for generating junk DNA, (5) spell out the necessary evolutionary conditions for maintaining junk DNA, (6) outline various methodologies for estimating the functional fraction within the genome, and (7) present a recent estimate for the functional fraction of our genome.